Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 25, 2017, 03:33:03 AM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Please note: Anyone posting ads not relating to FBI or FBI games or posting other unsolicited spam will be removed from this forum, will have all their posts removed, and will be banned from rejoining.

*** DO NOT POST SPAM!!! ***

Want to become a member???

Due to the huge amount of spam, registration is now completely manual. To become a member of the board, send an email to:

craig@october.com.au

Please be sure to include some info about the games you play so we know you're serious and not a spammer!! :-) Also choose a username (maybe one of your player names?).
We'll reply with your login details.

 1   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: BM-290 just ended, anyone in it?  on: November 09, 2017, 08:58:52 AM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose
Lets see if this post sticks.  It was an anonymous multi bitter end game.  I talked to the winner, seems he invaded someone, said someone started giving him all his worlds/keys/ships, then someone else invaded the winner and with the extra ships/keys made short work of him.

 2   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: BM-290 just ended, anyone in it?  on: October 29, 2017, 04:18:47 AM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose

 3   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: BM-290 just ended, anyone in it?  on: October 29, 2017, 04:18:09 AM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose

 4   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: BM-290 just ended, anyone in it?  on: October 29, 2017, 04:15:53 AM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose

 5   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: BM-290 just ended, anyone in it?  on: October 28, 2017, 12:19:28 PM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Craig Delahoy
BM? Does that stand for Bitter end/Multi? If so, Turn 23 is quite quick for a Bitter end game.

 6   Starweb / Starweb Games / BM-290 just ended, anyone in it?  on: October 28, 2017, 12:09:23 PM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose
Turn 23, amazing.

 7   General Discussions / General Chit-Chat / Re: Do you prefer "normal" games or "anonymous" games?  on: September 27, 2017, 07:31:10 PM 
Started by Vectrex | Last post by Lin Goldstein
I played regular Multi SW, with 5 players, and actually won once in a 2 vs. 3 situation.    In the next 2 games, one of the 3 in that 2 vs. 3 decided I was too good and formed a coalition against me in both games (once a 4 on 1, the other a 3 on 1 in which I successfully got the win to the neutral).    Since then I've played anonymous only.     I agree with Paul, backstabs are fairly rare, especially in WWBP (I don't have enough recent data for regular SW), in "normal" games.    In "anonymous" games, all bets are off, backstabs happen all the time.    So it's actually the reverse of what Vex suggests.

Lin

 8   General Discussions / General Chit-Chat / Re: No Heroic Fantasy?  on: September 19, 2017, 02:49:42 PM 
Started by martinp13 | Last post by robert2
Thanks so much for the helpful information.

 9   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: Printout format change?  on: September 18, 2017, 12:35:53 PM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose
I should mention, to fix the 0xa0 problem if you can run sed do:

sed -e 's/\xa0/ '/g < infile > outfile

If you can't run sed you have no idea what I'm talking about, look into cygwin for windows.

 10   Starweb / Starweb Games / Re: Printout format change?  on: September 18, 2017, 12:33:06 PM 
Started by Snotnose | Last post by Snotnose
Craig, what does your tool do and what is it written in?  I've got a Java world database program.  Keeps track of the worlds I've seen, the first time I saw it, the last time I saw it, and the IND, POP, METAL, etc (everything on the printout) from the last time I saw it.

I wrote it to help mapping.  Lets say you see W1(2, 3, 4), and W8(3, 9, 10).  It will show W3 connects to both 1 and 8.

Return to the board index.


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Flying Buffalo Forums | Powered by SMF 1.0.8.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!